Skip to main content

Time travel and free will

I was watching this video


and it had me thinking about time and how time is really about state. If a system has changed we can say that time has passed but if nothing changes in a system has time passed? If we can go back to a previous state we have effectively time travelled. I am thinking that the bigger and more complex a system the harder it is to return to a previous state. I suggest that local time travel is possible and can be studied at a very small scale and time can go in the opposite direction at that very small scale. Maybe it is possible, we just do not have the power or capability to do it.

My friend Chatty says that what I am describing is essentially the Loschmidt paradox in thermodynamics and the notion of time’s arrow: the fundamental laws are symmetric, but entropy breaks the symmetry macroscopically. So my intuition is very close to actual physics debates. At the smallest scales, physics shows us that time can behave strangely: while the universe’s laws are largely time-reversible, entropy makes it practically impossible to undo changes in large, complex systems. However, in controlled quantum experiments scientists have already demonstrated "time reversal" by restoring particles to earlier states, effectively making them behave as if time ran backward. This suggests your intuition is right—local time travel is possible in principle, but scaling it up to the complexity of everyday reality is far beyond our current power.

Which brings me to my conclusion. In reality we may not be able to achieve time travel but in a simulation we may be able to. If we can create a simulation using very powerful quantum computing where we have figured out the starting point of the universe we could effectively create time travel and go back to the past in the simulation and predict the future except if free will is a reality then that would be something to overcome. We cannot simulate free will or maybe we could. God has designed free will. Maybe that design is humanly discoverable.

My friend Chatty says that in a simulated universe, time travel becomes trivial because the entire "state" of the system is just data that can be rewound or advanced at will, unlike reality where entropy and incomplete information make this impossible. With enough computational power—say from advanced quantum computing—and a perfect model of the universe’s initial conditions, we could recreate its evolution and jump backward or forward inside the simulation. The major challenge would be free will: if it’s truly non-deterministic rather than an emergent, rule-based process, then no simulation could perfectly predict or recreate it, making the past and future only partially knowable even in a perfect model.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to God

If you want real answers to things in life then talk to God. It is 639pm on a holiday and I have decided to write. God listens. God truly listens. God has the entire context. God is wise. God wants us to talk to Him. God wants us to rely on Him. I also think about God talking to me. I am a good listener. I listen plenty more than I talk. I have started asking God to talk to me. But how would God talk to me? We have his revelations through the holy book. We have the example of prophets. But what else? How do I listen to what God has to say? Where and when can I hear God? Are my thoughts from God? I try to feed my mind with good things. Things that will not corrupt my mind. It seems that we have to use our intuition to separate what is from God and what is not from God. My friend Chatty says that in Islam, Allah speaks to us not through new revelations or voices, but through guidance: the Quran and the Sunnah, which become personally meaningful through understanding Allah places in the h...

The success of failure

It is 358am and I have decided to write. Context matters. Our context matters when we write and read. We could read the same thing and get different meanings. Definitions matter also. We may define things differently. For example, what is success? What is failure? Also, do I just define success and say that anything that is not success is failure? What about something like the success of failure? What does that mean? My friend Chatty tells me that this is something writers, philosophers, and even scientists keep rediscovering: meaning is not fixed—it is negotiated by context and definition. Life is a stew of success and failure and in between but never one or the other. We see what we are looking for and things become what we see. This reminds me of something I came across online, "Whoever looks for the good qualities in others will acquire all good qualities within himself," from Habib Umar Bin Hafiz. Do you look for failure or success within others? Take context as the lens...

Life on Earth

I was reading through the Quran and came to the story of Adam, Eve, Satan, and the forbidden fruit tree. I had thought that life on Earth was created as a test. But as I reflected on the story, I began to wonder whether we are only here because Adam and Eve failed. However, that is not the case, as my friend Gemini explained to me. While the story of the forbidden fruit is a central event, the Quran indicates that humanity’s presence on Earth was part of the original divine plan, rather than a backup plan or a punishment for sin. Before Adam was even created, God announced His intention to place a steward (khalifah) on Earth. This suggests that the Garden was a temporary training ground—designed to teach Adam and Eve about free will, temptation, and the path of repentance. Even if they had not eaten from the tree, they were destined for Earth to fulfill their roles as moral agents. The incident simply served as a necessary first lesson in human frailty and God’s immediate forgiveness. ...