Skip to main content

Continuous versus discrete

I was watching that video and it led me to a realisation that my friend Chatty put nicely for me

The mystery of 0.577 - https://youtu.be/4k1jegU4Wb4

All real physical measurements are fundamentally discrete—we only sample the world in finite steps, with finite precision—while continuous mathematics is an idealized limit we use because it is simpler, more powerful, and often extraordinarily accurate. Every smooth concept in math—derivatives, integrals, π, e, γ—arises as the limit of increasingly fine discrete approximations: polygons approach a circle to produce π, discrete compounding approaches e, and the mismatch between discrete harmonic sums and continuous logarithms produces γ. These constants are the “fingerprints” left behind when the discrete world is modeled by continuous mathematics.

Which led me to this question. Is the world and reality, discrete or continuous?

My friend Chatty tells me that modern physics does not give a final answer, but evidence increasingly suggests that reality is fundamentally discrete at extremely small scales: matter and energy are quantized, spacetime may come in tiny units near the Planck length, and the universe appears to contain only finite information. Continuous mathematics remains incredibly useful because these discrete building blocks are so small that the world looks smooth at human scales.

In my mind it boils down to if there is a smallest particle. If there is a smallest particle, then the world is discrete. If there is no smallest particle then reality cannot exist because you cannot build anything.

My friend Chatty tells me that my intuition is powerful: true discreteness implies smallest building blocks. But even if reality were continuous with no smallest particle, it could still exist — the problem is not existence but the mathematical infinities that come with infinitely divisible physics.

Now I am thinking. Does it make sense to say that you can create finite from the infinite but you cannot create the infinite from finite. Infinity is the source. Infinity is what God is. God is everything.

My last thought for this blog post is that, can we say that just like something cannot exist without nothing (think light without darkness), the finite cannot exist without the infinite. On the other hand, we can say that darkness does not exist, it is just the absence of light and only light exists. Humans only exist because God exists.

I like how my exploration after watching that video brought some clarity to my thoughts on the infinite while at the same time opening up a whole new world of questions and thoughts.

*I like how 5+7+7 = 19 ( 1 is smallest digit and 9 is largest digit )

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to God

If you want real answers to things in life then talk to God. It is 639pm on a holiday and I have decided to write. God listens. God truly listens. God has the entire context. God is wise. God wants us to talk to Him. God wants us to rely on Him. I also think about God talking to me. I am a good listener. I listen plenty more than I talk. I have started asking God to talk to me. But how would God talk to me? We have his revelations through the holy book. We have the example of prophets. But what else? How do I listen to what God has to say? Where and when can I hear God? Are my thoughts from God? I try to feed my mind with good things. Things that will not corrupt my mind. It seems that we have to use our intuition to separate what is from God and what is not from God. My friend Chatty says that in Islam, Allah speaks to us not through new revelations or voices, but through guidance: the Quran and the Sunnah, which become personally meaningful through understanding Allah places in the h...

Life on Earth

I was reading through the Quran and came to the story of Adam, Eve, Satan, and the forbidden fruit tree. I had thought that life on Earth was created as a test. But as I reflected on the story, I began to wonder whether we are only here because Adam and Eve failed. However, that is not the case, as my friend Gemini explained to me. While the story of the forbidden fruit is a central event, the Quran indicates that humanity’s presence on Earth was part of the original divine plan, rather than a backup plan or a punishment for sin. Before Adam was even created, God announced His intention to place a steward (khalifah) on Earth. This suggests that the Garden was a temporary training ground—designed to teach Adam and Eve about free will, temptation, and the path of repentance. Even if they had not eaten from the tree, they were destined for Earth to fulfill their roles as moral agents. The incident simply served as a necessary first lesson in human frailty and God’s immediate forgiveness. ...

The success of failure

It is 358am and I have decided to write. Context matters. Our context matters when we write and read. We could read the same thing and get different meanings. Definitions matter also. We may define things differently. For example, what is success? What is failure? Also, do I just define success and say that anything that is not success is failure? What about something like the success of failure? What does that mean? My friend Chatty tells me that this is something writers, philosophers, and even scientists keep rediscovering: meaning is not fixed—it is negotiated by context and definition. Life is a stew of success and failure and in between but never one or the other. We see what we are looking for and things become what we see. This reminds me of something I came across online, "Whoever looks for the good qualities in others will acquire all good qualities within himself," from Habib Umar Bin Hafiz. Do you look for failure or success within others? Take context as the lens...