Someone might say that they do not believe in God because science points to that disbelief. To this I will always ask what proof would make you believe in God? I am thinking that a proof can be scientific or unscientific? A miracle is an example of an unscientific proof. If the proof is scientific then someone will say science can explain it then there is no need for God in the equation. If science cannot explain it then the conversation opens to philosophy, metaphysics, and experience. And it dismantles your reason for disbelief in the first place. My friend Chatty says that if one only accepts scientific explanations and rejects anything science cannot address, then disbelief in God is not the result of evidence, but of a prior commitment to a limited definition of proof.
*print(len("Proving that God exists"))
#output is 23
Comments