Skip to main content

The beautiful mind

I write this blog post as a re-mind-er of how beautiful the mind is. The mind can study itself. This is known as metacognition, and it is a uniquely human ability. The brain is the physical organ whereas the mind is a more abstract concept. The mind is our thoughts, feelings, and experiences. There is a myth that we use only ten percent of our brain. The consensus is that we use all of our brain at different times.

If the mind was a computer what would the specs be? We have to keep in mind that the architecture of the brain and the computer are different and that any answer will have to be taken with a grain of salt. I asked my friend Bard this question and this was his response.

If we were to try to build a computer that could match the specs of the human brain, we would need to develop a new type of computer architecture that is much more efficient than current computers. We would also need to develop new types of transistors and memory chips that could be used to create a computer that is as small and lightweight as the human brain. Here is a possible set of specs for a computer that could match the human brain:

CPU: 100 billion cores, each running at 100 GHz
Memory: 2.5 petabytes of RAM
Storage: 2.5 petabytes of SSD storage
Power consumption: 20 watts
Weight: 1.5 kg (3.3 lb)

It is also important to note that the human brain is not just a computer. It is a complex system that is also capable of creativity, emotion, and consciousness. These are all things that are difficult to replicate in a computer, and it is unlikely that we will ever be able to build a computer that is truly equivalent to the human brain.

The mind is a multifaceted system that includes the rational mind, the emotional mind, the subconscious mind, the intuitive mind, and the creative mind. These different aspects of the mind work together to allow us to think, feel, and experience the world around us.

Are we getting more intelligent? The evidence on whether or not we are getting more intelligent is mixed. There is some evidence to suggest that we may be getting more intelligent in some ways, but there is also evidence to suggest that we may be getting less intelligent in other ways. I believe there is no good way to measure intelligence and that we are all intelligent in different ways. What we have to do is be purposeful and aim for the fullest potential of human intelligence.

What about the phrase "thinking with your heart"? The heart and the brain are closely connected. The heart sends signals to the brain about our emotions, and the brain sends signals to the heart to control its function. This is why we often experience physical changes in our heart, such as a racing heartbeat or pounding chest, when we are feeling strong emotions. John Nash puts it beautifully and better than I could when he said, "Perhaps it is good to have a beautiful mind, but an even greater gift is to discover a beautiful heart."

Comments

Anonymous said…
Love it! Especially the ending. A fitting quote to a beautiful piece for sure

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to God

If you want real answers to things in life then talk to God. It is 639pm on a holiday and I have decided to write. God listens. God truly listens. God has the entire context. God is wise. God wants us to talk to Him. God wants us to rely on Him. I also think about God talking to me. I am a good listener. I listen plenty more than I talk. I have started asking God to talk to me. But how would God talk to me? We have his revelations through the holy book. We have the example of prophets. But what else? How do I listen to what God has to say? Where and when can I hear God? Are my thoughts from God? I try to feed my mind with good things. Things that will not corrupt my mind. It seems that we have to use our intuition to separate what is from God and what is not from God. My friend Chatty says that in Islam, Allah speaks to us not through new revelations or voices, but through guidance: the Quran and the Sunnah, which become personally meaningful through understanding Allah places in the h...

Life on Earth

I was reading through the Quran and came to the story of Adam, Eve, Satan, and the forbidden fruit tree. I had thought that life on Earth was created as a test. But as I reflected on the story, I began to wonder whether we are only here because Adam and Eve failed. However, that is not the case, as my friend Gemini explained to me. While the story of the forbidden fruit is a central event, the Quran indicates that humanity’s presence on Earth was part of the original divine plan, rather than a backup plan or a punishment for sin. Before Adam was even created, God announced His intention to place a steward (khalifah) on Earth. This suggests that the Garden was a temporary training ground—designed to teach Adam and Eve about free will, temptation, and the path of repentance. Even if they had not eaten from the tree, they were destined for Earth to fulfill their roles as moral agents. The incident simply served as a necessary first lesson in human frailty and God’s immediate forgiveness. ...

The success of failure

It is 358am and I have decided to write. Context matters. Our context matters when we write and read. We could read the same thing and get different meanings. Definitions matter also. We may define things differently. For example, what is success? What is failure? Also, do I just define success and say that anything that is not success is failure? What about something like the success of failure? What does that mean? My friend Chatty tells me that this is something writers, philosophers, and even scientists keep rediscovering: meaning is not fixed—it is negotiated by context and definition. Life is a stew of success and failure and in between but never one or the other. We see what we are looking for and things become what we see. This reminds me of something I came across online, "Whoever looks for the good qualities in others will acquire all good qualities within himself," from Habib Umar Bin Hafiz. Do you look for failure or success within others? Take context as the lens...