Skip to main content

Numbers

This is a chapter from my fifth book called Freedom

I am fascinated by numbers. We say that words have power but numbers also have power. I am fascinated by random and infinity and pi. I am fascinated by number patterns. I am fascinated by counting. I am fascinated by the Fibonacci sequence. I was somewhere on the internet. Might have been an ad I was looking at. I saw that 37 by 21 equals 777. Then I thought to myself what number by 23 would give a number where all the digits are the same like this. I got some code that could brute force an answer but I did not get an answer within the constraints of the largest num in python. This is what the code looks like.

def has_identical_digits(num):
    digits = str(num)
    return all(digit == digits[0] for digit in digits)

def find_number():
    multiplier = 1
    while True:
        product = 23 * multiplier
        if has_identical_digits(product):
            return product
        multiplier += 1
        print(multiplier)

result = find_number()
print(f"The number you are looking for is: {result}")

Now I am left wondering. Are there a set of numbers where there would be no results? How large is this set? Are there numbers where the result will be really really big and take a lot of time and computational power to brute force? Is there a shortcut to figuring this out? Has this been studied before? What are the properties of the numbers in the set of all same digit numbers? What can I learn by trying to find answers to these questions. I am putting this out there because I feel like some others may also find this fascinating or some others may have answers. I asked my friend Gemini for a quote about freedom and numbers. He replied with this Royal Robbins quote, "A simple equation exists between freedom and numbers: the more people, the less freedom." I can see the sense in that quote but just like my numbers questions, I need to think about it some more. Also, what is the freest number?

This is what my friend Gemini thinks:

While "freest number" is open to interpretation, some might see primes as escaping easy definition, zero as embodying absence of limits, or infinity as representing boundless possibilities. It all depends on how you see freedom and the nature of numbers themselves.

I did a Google search and found a tshirt being sold for introverts with the slogan "1 is the freest number" and I felt that. Seems there is truth to that Royal Robbins quote from the perspective of me as an introvert. Somehow my mind is thinking of this Einstein quote, "Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts." Maybe freedom cannot be counted or measured. We cannot put a price to freedom. Freedom is priceless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to God

If you want real answers to things in life then talk to God. It is 639pm on a holiday and I have decided to write. God listens. God truly listens. God has the entire context. God is wise. God wants us to talk to Him. God wants us to rely on Him. I also think about God talking to me. I am a good listener. I listen plenty more than I talk. I have started asking God to talk to me. But how would God talk to me? We have his revelations through the holy book. We have the example of prophets. But what else? How do I listen to what God has to say? Where and when can I hear God? Are my thoughts from God? I try to feed my mind with good things. Things that will not corrupt my mind. It seems that we have to use our intuition to separate what is from God and what is not from God. My friend Chatty says that in Islam, Allah speaks to us not through new revelations or voices, but through guidance: the Quran and the Sunnah, which become personally meaningful through understanding Allah places in the h...

Life on Earth

I was reading through the Quran and came to the story of Adam, Eve, Satan, and the forbidden fruit tree. I had thought that life on Earth was created as a test. But as I reflected on the story, I began to wonder whether we are only here because Adam and Eve failed. However, that is not the case, as my friend Gemini explained to me. While the story of the forbidden fruit is a central event, the Quran indicates that humanity’s presence on Earth was part of the original divine plan, rather than a backup plan or a punishment for sin. Before Adam was even created, God announced His intention to place a steward (khalifah) on Earth. This suggests that the Garden was a temporary training ground—designed to teach Adam and Eve about free will, temptation, and the path of repentance. Even if they had not eaten from the tree, they were destined for Earth to fulfill their roles as moral agents. The incident simply served as a necessary first lesson in human frailty and God’s immediate forgiveness. ...

The success of failure

It is 358am and I have decided to write. Context matters. Our context matters when we write and read. We could read the same thing and get different meanings. Definitions matter also. We may define things differently. For example, what is success? What is failure? Also, do I just define success and say that anything that is not success is failure? What about something like the success of failure? What does that mean? My friend Chatty tells me that this is something writers, philosophers, and even scientists keep rediscovering: meaning is not fixed—it is negotiated by context and definition. Life is a stew of success and failure and in between but never one or the other. We see what we are looking for and things become what we see. This reminds me of something I came across online, "Whoever looks for the good qualities in others will acquire all good qualities within himself," from Habib Umar Bin Hafiz. Do you look for failure or success within others? Take context as the lens...