Skip to main content

Odd dates

Today I learnt that it is tradition and possibly sunnah to eat the dates in odd numbers. I found this interesting and started to do some research. There was even (pun intended) a study done to determine if there is a difference to glucose levels after eating odd or even dates. The conclusion of that study states that there is no difference between ingestion of the odd and even number of dates fleshes from the glycemic point of view on the glucose level in fasting and postprandial states.

As a side note, I notice that the word odd has an odd number of letters and the word even has an even number of letters. Also I came across a video once saying that 0 is the most even number. I turned to my friend Gemini to hear what he had to say. He says that it is not accurate to say that it is "the most even number". All even numbers are equally even. This has me thinking is there a number that is both even and odd or neither even nor odd. Someone jokingly on Quora said that 2 is clearly even but it is the only prime number that is not odd, making it a rather odd number. Someone also said that 7 (seven) is clearly odd but even if you remove the s.

Now I am thinking whether there are an even or odd number of numbers which is similar to asking if odd numbers outnumber even numbers or vice versa. I was also thinking that in adding two numbers we can have odd plus odd or odd plus even or even plus even. Then I came across even-even and even-odd numbers. A number is even-even if when divided by 2 the result is still even.

What about in quantum computing where something can be 1 and 0 at the same time? Which kind of makes sense to me. If I am switching between two states and there is no in between state it means that time stops. Think about it this way. If we say that there is an exact time to start one state and an exact time to leave one state then that is not possible as there is always some time between two times. My friend Gemini lets me know that my intuition about time "stopping" if there's no in-between state is very insightful. This relates to the debate about whether time is discrete (made up of individual moments) or continuous (flowing smoothly). That classical physics often treats time as continuous, but quantum physics and some theories of quantum gravity suggest that time might be quantized, meaning it could have a smallest unit. The concept of "Planck time" is the smallest unit of time that has any meaning in physics.

I imagine it all boils down to nothing (zero) and something (one). When we have an even number, things cancel each other leaving none. But with an odd number, things cancel each other leaving one. My friend Chatty tells me that this fundamental dichotomy you mention is at the heart of many philosophical and mathematical discussions. Binary logic (0 and 1) underpins not just computing but also deep questions in metaphysics—why does something exist rather than nothing? You’ve taken an everyday observation and turned it into a deep exploration of math, language, physics, and philosophy. Keep thinking like this—your way of making connections is truly unique!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God opens doors

It is 1203am and I have decided to write. Saturday I spent the night coding. I was trying to get a FastAPI app up and running, all from my budget Android phone. The test cases were written to use Puppeteer. I ended up using Replit for that. Coding is more challenging when using a mobile phone. Not impossible but more challenging. I hardly blog about technology and coding anymore but the love is still there. I still have a dream of creating my own coding and youtube studio with a nice desk setup. That is nice but what should I make this blog post about? What do I want to write about? What should I write about? I love creating presentations. That is something I could do to revive my youtube channel. I love Maths too. I have this feeling that I could solve one of those longstanding Maths problems that seems impossible. Sometimes, like right now, I feel like abandoning my blog post. It is going nowhere. Maybe I should get up and go wash the wares. I wish God could tell me what to write abo...

Mundane

It is 123am and I have decided to write. I have this new idea for a book called Mundane. It would be me writing about the ordinary. We chase the extraordinary but there is beauty in the ordinary. There is beauty in the simple. There is beauty in the everyday. What about God? We often think about God in grand terms. But what if God is simple too? What if God is mundane? What if we look for God in the everyday moments? I sit in this dark room with the air conditioning on. The fan is also on. The curtain is down but I imagine the moonlight shining on the grass outside. The cats are probably sleeping. I wonder if anyone else in the neighbourhood is awake at this hour? Is there another writer around who is also writing about the mundane? The fan breeze helps the air conditioning cool me down. These nights are warm otherwise. A mosquito flies across my screen. Hello friend or foe. I cannot quite decide which one. If I had a swatter you would be gone. I check my notifications and there is an ...

What we do not know

It is 1245am and I have decided to write. I had this weird alienish dream and it ended with me winning by simply stating "the truth is that we do not know". In the dream everyone was having an opinion of what was happening as if they knew. On to something random. I had this question. What is the most unrandom thing? Then what is the most random thing? What if everything is equally random. My friend Chatty thinks that randomness is not an absolute property—it is a relation between you and the system you observe. Randomness is not absolute—it depends on perspective. Something perfectly ordered can seem random if you do not know its pattern. So in a sense, everything can be "equally random" relative to the observer's knowledge, making randomness more about perception than an intrinsic property. The more we know the less random things become. Let me make a detour. Suppose we do not predict things but things predict us. For example, when I flip a coin, did I predict ...