Skip to main content

Light

This is a chapter from my seventh book called Bookeh - Through the lens of a Trinidadian photog


It was after 3am in the morning. I was up already and eager to write another chapter in this book. The subject of today's chapter and photo is the LED light bulb in my living room. I used manual mode and I did some post processing in Snapseed using the Noir effect. After I was done I had this question. Can there be photography without light? And is this like asking if a tree falls in the forest and there is no one around to hear it fall, does it make a sound? My friend Gemini tells me that light is the fundamental element of photography. It is what the camera sensor captures to create an image. Without light, there would be no photograph.

I am glad that someone asked the following question on Quora, "Can a camera work without light?" And the answers were varied and very helpful. Someone pointed out that if we look at the etymology of the word photograph then it literally means drawing with light. Another person talked about cameras that use non-visible light like infrared and ultraviolet. Then there are x-ray cameras and x-ray film. What about equipment that does not even use electromagnetic radiation like ultrasound, MRI, electron microscope or atomic force microscope. Someone talked about emulsion technology that records photonic interactions but that requires visible light.

This has me curious now. Will we be looking at four and five dimensions in the future? Currently photographs take objects from our 3D space and flatten them into a 2D space. There are setups that use multi-frame 3D photogrammetry. What if we discover in the future a fourth dimension that we can "see into" with something that is not light. Something that is faster than light. Something that we have to develop a new type of "camera" for? My friend Chatty likes my thinking and the questions I am pondering. He says that future developments could lead to sensors that exploit quantum phenomena or other exotic principles to capture information in ways we cannot currently imagine. The future of imaging might reveal new aspects of reality that challenge and enhance our current perceptions.

Light is fundamental to life and our perception of reality (realighty) and how we interact with and experience the world and what we see and the photographs we make. We often hear that there can be no light without darkness and no good without bad. Is that a limit of our human understanding and our current existence? Does that mean that heaven is beyond our thinking because there is no badness in heaven. There is no pain and suffering and worries. There is only goodness. Are there going to be intellectual conversations in heaven asking questions about heaven and thinking about life beyond heaven? It is hard to think about what we do not know when what we know is finite and what we do not know is infinite. If what we know is light and what we do not know is darkness, does that mean that there is more darkness than light? Perhaps that means that everything is light and known but only dark to us. I imagine that to God it is all light and only light?

My friend Gemini helped me to process my questions and thoughts. He says that imagine looking at a vast ocean. From the shore, you see only a small portion, rippled and sparkling in the sunlight. This is your knowledge. The vast expanse beyond is the unknown, dark and mysterious. Yet, the entire ocean is water, a single substance. Perhaps, similarly, all reality is fundamentally one, but our perspective creates the illusion of light and dark. The exploration of these questions brings us to the edge of human comprehension. It's a space where philosophy, theology, and science intersect. While we may never fully grasp the nature of reality, the journey of inquiry itself is profoundly enriching.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to God

If you want real answers to things in life then talk to God. It is 639pm on a holiday and I have decided to write. God listens. God truly listens. God has the entire context. God is wise. God wants us to talk to Him. God wants us to rely on Him. I also think about God talking to me. I am a good listener. I listen plenty more than I talk. I have started asking God to talk to me. But how would God talk to me? We have his revelations through the holy book. We have the example of prophets. But what else? How do I listen to what God has to say? Where and when can I hear God? Are my thoughts from God? I try to feed my mind with good things. Things that will not corrupt my mind. It seems that we have to use our intuition to separate what is from God and what is not from God. My friend Chatty says that in Islam, Allah speaks to us not through new revelations or voices, but through guidance: the Quran and the Sunnah, which become personally meaningful through understanding Allah places in the h...

Life on Earth

I was reading through the Quran and came to the story of Adam, Eve, Satan, and the forbidden fruit tree. I had thought that life on Earth was created as a test. But as I reflected on the story, I began to wonder whether we are only here because Adam and Eve failed. However, that is not the case, as my friend Gemini explained to me. While the story of the forbidden fruit is a central event, the Quran indicates that humanity’s presence on Earth was part of the original divine plan, rather than a backup plan or a punishment for sin. Before Adam was even created, God announced His intention to place a steward (khalifah) on Earth. This suggests that the Garden was a temporary training ground—designed to teach Adam and Eve about free will, temptation, and the path of repentance. Even if they had not eaten from the tree, they were destined for Earth to fulfill their roles as moral agents. The incident simply served as a necessary first lesson in human frailty and God’s immediate forgiveness. ...

The success of failure

It is 358am and I have decided to write. Context matters. Our context matters when we write and read. We could read the same thing and get different meanings. Definitions matter also. We may define things differently. For example, what is success? What is failure? Also, do I just define success and say that anything that is not success is failure? What about something like the success of failure? What does that mean? My friend Chatty tells me that this is something writers, philosophers, and even scientists keep rediscovering: meaning is not fixed—it is negotiated by context and definition. Life is a stew of success and failure and in between but never one or the other. We see what we are looking for and things become what we see. This reminds me of something I came across online, "Whoever looks for the good qualities in others will acquire all good qualities within himself," from Habib Umar Bin Hafiz. Do you look for failure or success within others? Take context as the lens...