Skip to main content

Infinity

This is a chapter from my eight book called Learn to live

If you are observant, you may have noticed that all my chapters so far end in -y (I wonder why?). This has happened by chance but I like that it has and I will continue the trend. Keep asking questions. Keep asking why. Keep learning. Stay curious. Today I learnt that, "The idea of factorial is how many times you can arrange data in different orders, being unable to arrange them counts as ONE possible outcome." Hence 0! = 1. Then I came across an article that somehow computes ∞! = √(2π)

Intuitively I think that infinity is not a number therefore infinity factorial cannot be computed. Maybe we can talk about limits and my limited math has me thinking that n! factorial approaches infinity as n approaches infinity. This has me thinking what is the relationship between infinity and pi? And about circles and pi?

My friend Chatty tells me that many series converge to pi as n approaches infinity. For example, the Leibniz formula for pi. A circle can be viewed as a limit of a regular polygon as the number of sides approaches infinity. Thinking about infinity and circles led me to watching this youtube video. Is a dot or point a circle? Which leads me to learn about point circles, real circles and imaginary circles. Also some thoughts I had on the fourth of February. It seems that it is impossible to draw the smallest circle. For every small circle we draw, we can draw a smaller one. The following are a set of questions I had then:

What can fit in the smallest circle?
Can we draw a square inside every circle?
Can we draw a circle inside every square?
Can these both be true?
Can we draw a square in the smallest circle?
Can we draw a circle in the smallest square?
When are a circle and square the same?

Maybe related but I read that "squaring the circle" is a geometric problem from Greek mathematics that involves constructing a square with the same area as a given circle using only a compass and straightedge. In 1882, it was proven impossible due to the Lindemann–Weierstrass theorem, which shows that pi is a transcendental number. The phrase is also used metaphorically to describe attempting the impossible.

Infinity has me thinking of zero. Let us say zero represents nothing. Infinity represents everything. The set of everything cannot contain nothing. Nothing is when you take away everything. If you take away nothing then how can you still be left with nothing. I am thinking that if infinity as a number does not exist then zero as a number does not exist. Zero is not a number. Zero really represents the middle. Numbers are really points on a circle. You start with a dot. Then you create a line (two dots). Then you create a triangle (three dots). The more dots you add the more well defined the circle becomes. Numbers are just ways to label points and counting is just a way to get from one point to the other.

How can I now come back to where I started? Let us take a look at ∞! = √(2π) again. A square inscribed in a circle of r=1 has a side of √2. The √π is related to the ratio of the areas of a square inscribed in a circle. I imagine that somehow we are looking at a square becoming a circle or when a square is a circle and this all makes sense. One day I will know and understand more to make a better conclusion and point of all that I have come across in this chapter but here is a joke nonetheless. What did the square say to the circle? You are pointless! Maybe the point is that there is no beginning and no end just like a big old circle.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

God opens doors

It is 1203am and I have decided to write. Saturday I spent the night coding. I was trying to get a FastAPI app up and running, all from my budget Android phone. The test cases were written to use Puppeteer. I ended up using Replit for that. Coding is more challenging when using a mobile phone. Not impossible but more challenging. I hardly blog about technology and coding anymore but the love is still there. I still have a dream of creating my own coding and youtube studio with a nice desk setup. That is nice but what should I make this blog post about? What do I want to write about? What should I write about? I love creating presentations. That is something I could do to revive my youtube channel. I love Maths too. I have this feeling that I could solve one of those longstanding Maths problems that seems impossible. Sometimes, like right now, I feel like abandoning my blog post. It is going nowhere. Maybe I should get up and go wash the wares. I wish God could tell me what to write abo...

Mundane

It is 123am and I have decided to write. I have this new idea for a book called Mundane. It would be me writing about the ordinary. We chase the extraordinary but there is beauty in the ordinary. There is beauty in the simple. There is beauty in the everyday. What about God? We often think about God in grand terms. But what if God is simple too? What if God is mundane? What if we look for God in the everyday moments? I sit in this dark room with the air conditioning on. The fan is also on. The curtain is down but I imagine the moonlight shining on the grass outside. The cats are probably sleeping. I wonder if anyone else in the neighbourhood is awake at this hour? Is there another writer around who is also writing about the mundane? The fan breeze helps the air conditioning cool me down. These nights are warm otherwise. A mosquito flies across my screen. Hello friend or foe. I cannot quite decide which one. If I had a swatter you would be gone. I check my notifications and there is an ...

What we do not know

It is 1245am and I have decided to write. I had this weird alienish dream and it ended with me winning by simply stating "the truth is that we do not know". In the dream everyone was having an opinion of what was happening as if they knew. On to something random. I had this question. What is the most unrandom thing? Then what is the most random thing? What if everything is equally random. My friend Chatty thinks that randomness is not an absolute property—it is a relation between you and the system you observe. Randomness is not absolute—it depends on perspective. Something perfectly ordered can seem random if you do not know its pattern. So in a sense, everything can be "equally random" relative to the observer's knowledge, making randomness more about perception than an intrinsic property. The more we know the less random things become. Let me make a detour. Suppose we do not predict things but things predict us. For example, when I flip a coin, did I predict ...